LBF Travel Management Corp. v. DeRosa

District Court, S.D. California·Decided March 20, 2023·No. 3:20-cv-02404·Unknown

Opinion

LBF TRAVEL MANAGEMENT CORP., Case No.: 20-cv-02404-MMA-JLB et al., ORDER RESETTING MANDATORY Plaintiffs, SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE AND v. ISSUING UPDATED PROCEDURES

THOMAS DEROSA, et al., [ECF Nos. 32, 196] Defendants. AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS.

The Mandatory Settlement Conference (“MSC”) in this matter is currently scheduled for April 7, 2023, at 9:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt as a videoconference. (ECF No. 196.) Due to a conflict in the Court’s calendar, the Court hereby RESETS the MSC for April 5, 2023, at 9:00 AM before Judge Burkhardt.1 The Court further issues the following updated procedures and deadlines related to the MSC:

1 If any party believes the MSC is more likely to be successful if conducted in-person, that party shall meet and confer on the issue with the other parties. After meeting and conferring, and no later than 14 days before the MSC, the parties shall leave a joint voicemail with chambers at (619) 557-6624 indicating which of the parties requests an in- 1. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16.3, all party representatives and claims adjusters for insured defendants with full and unlimited authority2 to negotiate and enter into a binding settlement, as well as the principal attorney(s) responsible for the litigation, must be present and legally and factually prepared to discuss and resolve the case at the MSC. In the case of an entity, an authorized representative of the entity who is not retained outside counsel must be present and must have discretionary authority to commit the entity to pay an amount up to the amount of the Plaintiff’s prayer (excluding punitive damages prayers). The purpose of this requirement is to have representatives present who can settle the case during the course of the conference without consulting a superior. Counsel for a United States government entity may be excused from this requirement so long as the government attorney who attends the MSC conference (1) has primary responsibility for handling the case, and (2) may negotiate settlement offers which the attorney is willing to recommend to the government official having ultimate settlement authority. Failure to attend the MSC or obtain proper excuse will be considered grounds for sanctions. /// ///

person MSC. In the voicemail, the parties shall leave three mutually available dates for a telephonic status conference to discuss whether the MSC should be held in-person. The final decision will be made by the Court. 2 “Full authority to settle” means that the individuals at the settlement conference must be authorized to fully explore settlement options and to agree at that time to any settlement terms acceptable to the parties. Heileman Brewing Co., Inc. v. Joseph Oat Corp., 871 F.2d 648 (7th Cir. 1989). The person needs to have “unfettered discretion and authority” to change the settlement position of a party. Pitman v. Brinker Int’l., Inc., 216 F.R.D. 481, 485–86 (D. Ariz. 2003). The purpose of requiring a person with unlimited settlement authority to attend the conference includes that the person’s view of the case may be altered during the face to face conference. Id. at 486. A limited or a sum certain of authority is not adequate. Nick v. Morgan’s Foods, Inc., 270 F.3d 590, 595–97 (8th Cir. 2001). 2. No later than 14 days before the MSC, the parties shall meet and confer in person or telephonically, as required by § III.B. of Judge Burkhardt’s Civil Chambers Rules. 3. No later than March 29, 2023, counsel (and any unrepresented parties) shall lodge confidential MSC statements with Judge Burkhardt’s chambers via e-mail at efile_Burkhardt@casd.uscourts.gov. The parties’ MSC statements shall comply with § III.C. of Judge Burkhardt’s Civil Chambers Rules. 4. The parties are directed to read and shall comply with § III.B–C of Judge Burkhardt’s Civil Chambers Rules, which set forth the Court’s requirements for the MSC. Failure to comply with the Court’s requirements will be grounds for sanctions.3 5. The Court will use its official ZoomGov video conferencing account to hold the MSC. IF YOU ARE UNFAMILIAR WITH ZOOM: Zoom is available on computers through a download on the Zoom website (https://zoom.us/meetings) or on mobile devices through the installation of a free app.4 Joining a Zoom conference does not require creating a Zoom account, but it does require downloading the .exe file (if using a computer) or the app (if using a mobile device). Participants are encouraged to create an account, install Zoom, and familiarize themselves with Zoom in advance of the MSC.5 There is a cost-free option for creating a Zoom account. 6. Prior to the start of the MSC, the Court will e-mail each MSC participant an invitation to join a Zoom video conference. Again, if possible, participants are encouraged to use laptops or desktop computers for the video conference, as mobile devices often offer inferior performance. Because Zoom may quickly deplete the battery of a participant’s

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LBF Travel Management Corp. v. DeRosa, (S.D. Cal. 2023).

LBF Travel Management Corp. v. DeRosa (LBF Travel Management Corp. v. DeRosa) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related