Lazes v. Kaplan
This text of 275 A.D.2d 790 (Lazes v. Kaplan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The finding of the jury is against the weight of the evidence. Nolan, P. J., Adel and Wenzel, JJ., concur; Carswell, J., dissents and votes to affirm on the following cases: Costello v. Forest Hills Dwellings (227 App. Div. 736); Cantone v. City of New York (273 App. Div. 864); Russo v. Sorrentino (250 App. Div. 882, smooth ice condition); Fitzgerald v. City of New Rochelle (259 App. Div. 1015, motion for leave to appeal denied 285 N. Y. 856, smooth ice condition); Williams v. City of New York (214 N. Y. 259, 263); Bordonaro v. Bank of Blasdell (285 N. Y. 606); Berkowitz v. Prudential Sav. Bank (269 App. Div. 988); Ringel v. Jaffe (254 App. Div. 892); Galvano v. Klein, Inc. (257 App. Div. 989); Galvano v. City of New York (260 App. Div. 926, revd. 285 N. Y. 818), and Zahn v. City of New York (274 App. Div. 807, affd. 299 N. Y. 581). MaeCrate, J., concurs with Carswell, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
275 A.D.2d 790, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lazes-v-kaplan-nyappdiv-1949.