Berkowitz v. Prudential Savings Bank
This text of 269 A.D. 988 (Berkowitz v. Prudential Savings Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Action of the plaintiff wife to recover damages for personal injuries suffered as a consequence of falling on the steps leading to the entrance of the defendant bank because of an alleged dangerous icy condition. Companion action of plaintiff husband for expenses and loss of services. Judgment dismissing the complaint reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. Questions of fact as to liability were presented by this record. (Bordonaro v. Bank of Blasdell, 285 N. Y. 606.) Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Lewis, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
269 A.D. 988, 58 N.Y.S.2d 280, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berkowitz-v-prudential-savings-bank-nyappdiv-1945.