Berkowitz v. Prudential Savings Bank

269 A.D. 988, 58 N.Y.S.2d 280
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 13, 1945·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Action of the plaintiff wife to recover damages for personal injuries suffered as a consequence of falling on the steps leading to the entrance of the defendant bank because of an alleged dangerous icy condition. Companion action of plaintiff husband for expenses and loss of services. Judgment dismissing the complaint reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. Questions of fact as to liability were presented by this record. (Bordonaro v. Bank of Blasdell, 285 N. Y. 606.) Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Lewis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Berkowitz v. Prudential Savings Bank, 269 A.D. 988, 58 N.Y.S.2d 280 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1945).

269 A.D. 988 (Berkowitz v. Prudential Savings Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mason v. Lodge
30 A.D.2d 605 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1968)
Lazes v. Kaplan
275 A.D.2d 790 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1949)