Lazarus v. Rice
268 A.D. 985, 52 N.Y.S.2d 781, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4568
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 22, 1944·Published·Cited by 7 cases
Opinion
On a motion for leave to serve an amended complaint the sufficiency of the proposed pleading will not ordinarily be inquired into. (Holgan Bros., Inc., v. Beekman Hospital, 267 App. Div. 815, 816.) It cannot be said on the present record that plaintiff was guilty of loches as a matter of law. Order reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and 'the motion granted. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.; Glennon and Cohn, JJ., dissent and vote to affirm. Settle order on notice. [See 269 App. Div. 684.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lazarus v. Rice, 268 A.D. 985, 52 N.Y.S.2d 781, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4568 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1944).
268 A.D. 985 (Lazarus v. Rice) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kamen v. State
34 Misc. 2d 380 (New York State Court of Claims, 1962)
Amherst Bowling Center, Inc. v. Dolce
11 A.D.2d 1079 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1960)
Station Associates, Inc. v. Long Island Rail Road
18 Misc. 2d 1092 (New York Supreme Court, 1959)
City of New York v. Washington Cemetery
17 Misc. 2d 847 (New York Supreme Court, 1959)
Rubinraut v. Federico Causo Consignataria Sociedad Anonima
4 Misc. 2d 761 (New York Supreme Court, 1957)
Mercy v. University Gardens Property Owners Ass'n
208 Misc. 412 (New York Supreme Court, 1955)
Blessington v. McCrory Stores Corp.
195 Misc. 710 (New York Supreme Court, 1949)