Holgan Bros. v. Beekman Hospital
This text of 267 A.D. 815 (Holgan Bros. v. Beekman Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order denying defendant’s motion for summary judgment unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the plaintiff. Order denying plaintiff’s motion for leave to serve an amended complaint unanimously reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the plaintiff, and the said motion granted on payment of twenty-five dollars costs to the defendant. [816]*816A party to an action should be permitted to put his pleading in such form as will enable him to have determined at the trial every question affecting his interest in the subject matter of the litigation. (Washington Life Ins. Go. v. Scott, 119 App. Div. 847.) The sufficiency of the proposed amended pleading is not necessarily involved, and is not passed on. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Dore and Callahan, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
267 A.D. 815, 47 N.Y.S.2d 103, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4901, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holgan-bros-v-beekman-hospital-nyappdiv-1944.