Lazarus I. Levine and Norman L. Marks, Executors of the Estate of Samuel Stein v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

250 F.2d 798
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedJanuary 6, 1958
Docket44, Docket 24516
StatusPublished
Cited by68 cases

This text of 250 F.2d 798 (Lazarus I. Levine and Norman L. Marks, Executors of the Estate of Samuel Stein v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lazarus I. Levine and Norman L. Marks, Executors of the Estate of Samuel Stein v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 250 F.2d 798 (2d Cir. 1958).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The income tax deficiencies for 1944 and 1945 here assessed against the estate of the deceased taxpayer, Samuel Stein, were based upon findings that certain proceeds of sales of goods in Stein’s bank accounts really represented sales by Stein’s wholly owned corporation and thus were taxable first as income to the corporation and then as dividends to Stein. These findings are not here challenged, but petitioners by a motion to revise the opinion and decision of the Tax Court raised the issue that Stein had actually paid for the original purchase of goods thus sold and petitioners could therefore take the purchase price as a deduction in computing the tax. But the Tax Court in denying the motion found the evidence that such payments came from Stein, rather than his corporation, insufficient to sustain petitioners’ burden and held that the purchase price was to be attributed to the corporation. This is the sole issue on appeal. We do not find the court’s holding clearly erroneous and affirm on Judge Black’s original opinion, Estate of Stein v. C. I. R., 25 T.C. 940, and on his memorandum opinion accompanying the order denying the motion to revise.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ericson v. Comm'r
2016 T.C. Memo. 107 (U.S. Tax Court, 2016)
Hie Holdings, Inc. v. Comm'r
2009 T.C. Memo. 130 (U.S. Tax Court, 2009)
Downing v. Comm'r
2003 T.C. Memo. 347 (U.S. Tax Court, 2003)
BALOT v. COMMISSIONER
2001 T.C. Memo. 73 (U.S. Tax Court, 2001)
Toushin v. Commissioner
1999 T.C. Memo. 171 (U.S. Tax Court, 1999)
Levine v. Commissioner
1998 T.C. Memo. 383 (U.S. Tax Court, 1998)
Zipp v. Commissioner
1998 T.C. Memo. 371 (U.S. Tax Court, 1998)
Iles v. Commissioner
1998 T.C. Memo. 337 (U.S. Tax Court, 1998)
Gleave v. Comm'r
1997 T.C. Memo. 276 (U.S. Tax Court, 1997)
Grossman v. Commissioner
1996 T.C. Memo. 452 (U.S. Tax Court, 1996)
Fields v. Commissioner
1996 T.C. Memo. 425 (U.S. Tax Court, 1996)
Kale v. Commissioner
1996 T.C. Memo. 197 (U.S. Tax Court, 1996)
William Kale v. Commissioner
1996 T.C. Memo. 196 (U.S. Tax Court, 1996)
Lee v. Commissioner
1995 T.C. Memo. 597 (U.S. Tax Court, 1995)
Houser v. Commissioner
1995 T.C. Memo. 330 (U.S. Tax Court, 1995)
Lausterer v. Commissioner
1995 T.C. Memo. 130 (U.S. Tax Court, 1995)
House v. Commissioner
1995 T.C. Memo. 92 (U.S. Tax Court, 1995)
Anderson v. Commissioner
1995 T.C. Memo. 8 (U.S. Tax Court, 1995)
Baker v. Commissioner
1994 T.C. Memo. 283 (U.S. Tax Court, 1994)
Corrigan v. Commissioner
1994 T.C. Memo. 31 (U.S. Tax Court, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
250 F.2d 798, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lazarus-i-levine-and-norman-l-marks-executors-of-the-estate-of-samuel-ca2-1958.