Lawyer v. Anderson

275 Pa. 211
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 20, 1922·No. Appeal, No. 22·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Pbr Curiam,

This is an action of ejectment where the verdict favored the plaintiff, but the common pleas entered judgment n. o. v. for defendant; on appeal, the Superior Court reversed and ordered judgment for plaintiff. After examining the record and considering the arguments of counsel, we are not convinced of error, and affirm on the opinion of the last’-mentioned tribunal.

The judgment of the Superior Court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lawyer v. Anderson, 275 Pa. 211 (Pa. 1922).

275 Pa. 211 (Lawyer v. Anderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fidelity Mortgage Guarantee Co. v. Bobb
160 A. 120 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1931)
Goldsmith v. Means
158 A. 596 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1931)
Persky v. Wolicki Et Ux.
135 A. 609 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1926)
Feld v. Shapiro
87 Pa. Super. 557 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1925)