Lawyer v. Anderson
This text of 275 Pa. 211 (Lawyer v. Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Pbr Curiam,
This is an action of ejectment where the verdict favored the plaintiff, but the common pleas entered judgment n. o. v. for defendant; on appeal, the Superior Court reversed and ordered judgment for plaintiff. After examining the record and considering the arguments of counsel, we are not convinced of error, and affirm on the opinion of the last’-mentioned tribunal.
The judgment of the Superior Court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
275 Pa. 211, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lawyer-v-anderson-pa-1922.