Lawson v. Washington

319 F.3d 498
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided February 7, 2003·No. No. 00-35458·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinions

[499] ORDER

The Order filed on January 3, 2003, denying the petition for rehearing en banc, is hereby amended to include Judge Ber-zon’s attached dissent from the denial of rehearing en banc. This order and Judge Berzon’s dissent shall be published.

Judge Tallman has voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc and Judge Reavley has so recommended. Judge B. Fletcher has recommended granting the petition for rehearing en banc.

The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R.App. P. 35.

The petition for rehearing en banc is therefore denied.

The mandate shall issue in due course.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lawson v. Washington, 319 F.3d 498 (9th Cir. 2003).

319 F.3d 498 (Lawson v. Washington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mohamed v. 1st Class Staffing, LLC
286 F. Supp. 3d 884 (S.D. Ohio, 2017)
Nichols v. Illinois Department of Transportation
152 F. Supp. 3d 1106 (N.D. Illinois, 2016)
US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Placer ARC
114 F. Supp. 3d 1048 (E.D. California, 2015)
Siddiqi v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.
572 F. Supp. 2d 353 (S.D. New York, 2008)
Tepper v. Potter
Sixth Circuit, 2007
Lawson v. Washington
319 F.3d 498 (Ninth Circuit, 2003)