Lawson v. Drug Abuse Control Commission

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lawson v. Drug Abuse Control Commission

50 A.D.2d 1019, 376 N.Y.S.2d 700, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12011

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 23, 1975

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 50 A.D.2d 1019 (Lawson v. Drug Abuse Control Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lawson v. Drug Abuse Control Commission, 50 A.D.2d 1019, 376 N.Y.S.2d 700, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12011 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered February 27, 1975 in Washington County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, granted jail-time credit for the time served by petitioner at Woodbourne Rehabilitation Center between December 3, 1973 and May 22, 1974. In view of the peculiar circumstances of this case, wherein it is conceded that there was confusion concerning just which commitments the petitioner was detained under, and the purpose for which he was detained at Woodbourne Rehabilitation Center during the period in question, the petitioner should receive jail-time credit for that period. Judgment affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Sweeney, Kane, Koreman and Larkin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered February 27, 1975 in Washington County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, granted jail-time credit for the time served by petitioner at Woodbourne Rehabilitation Center between December 3, 1973 and May 22, 1974. In view of the peculiar circumstances of this case, wherein it is conceded that there was confusion concerning just which commitments the petitioner was detained under, and the purpose for which he was detained at Woodbourne Rehabilitation Center during the period in question, the petitioner should receive jail-time credit for that period. Judgment affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Sweeney, Kane, Koreman and Larkin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 A.D.2d 1019, 376 N.Y.S.2d 700, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12011, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lawson-v-drug-abuse-control-commission-nyappdiv-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack