Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Lawrence v. State

Lawrence v. State

277 S.E.2d 60, 157 Ga. App. 264, 1981 Ga. App. LEXIS 1771
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 29, 1981
Docket60931
StatusPublished
Cited by29 cases

This text of 277 S.E.2d 60 (Lawrence v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lawrence v. State, 277 S.E.2d 60, 157 Ga. App. 264, 1981 Ga. App. LEXIS 1771 (Ga. Ct. App. 1981).

Opinion

Deen, Presiding Judge.

1. Circumstantial evidence may be sufficient to authorize á finding that a defendant accused of driving a motor vehicle under the influence of intoxicants was guilty of the offense although no witness testified positively to having seen him operating the vehicle. Where a police officer comes upon the defendant standing beside his wrecked automobile which has skidded off the road and into a ditch, who admits he was the driver of the vehicle, is unsteady on his feet, talks incoherently, is unable to explain the details of the single-vehicle accident, and reeks of alcohol, such testimony is sufficient to support the conclusion that the defendant was driving while intoxicated. Stephens v. State, 127 Ga. App. 416 (193 SE2d 870); Tutt v. State, 128 Ga. App. 636 (197 SE2d 432) (1973); Glisson v. State, 134 Ga. App. 380 (214 SE2d 386) (1975).

2. A witness who satisfactorily shows that he had opportunity to observe, and did observe, the condition of another, may testify whether that person was under the influence of intoxicants and the extent thereof, stating the facts upon which the opinion is based. Fountain v. Smith, 103 Ga. App. 192 (1) (118 SE2d 852) (1961); Bagley v. Smith, 98 Ga. App. 825, 826 (2) (107 SE2d 232) (1959); Harris v. State, 97 Ga. App. 495 (3) (103 SE2d 443) (1958); Joiner v. State, 51 Ga. App. 463 (1) (180 SE 911) (1935). Since drunkenness is easy of detection and difficult of explanation “the question of intoxication is better determined from the direct answers of those who saw him than from any description of his conduct,” the witness being able to reinforce his statement by the facts on which this opinion is based. Durham v. State, 166 Ga. 561 (3-a) (144 SE 109) (1928). The question at issue being whether the vehicle in which the defendant and the witness were riding plowed into a ditch because the defendant lost control of the car, and it then broke an axle, or whether the axle *265 snapped, causing the car to careen out of control and into the ditch, the various questions asked of the witness on cross examination, including whether in his opinion Mr. Lawrence’s driving had anything to do with the accident and whether Mr. Lawrence was under the influence of alcohol at the time were improperly ruled out on objection. This is particularly true in that another witness was permitted to testify on direct examination by the state and under substantially similar circumstances that in his opinion the defendant was drunk shortly after the wreck.

Decided January 29, 1981. Thomas C. Sanders, for appellant. W. A. Foster III, District Attorney, Jeff Richards, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.

Judgment reversed.

Birdsong and Sognier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Thomas A. Hassard v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2013
Hassard v. State
738 S.E.2d 293 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2013)
Wilson v. State
708 S.E.2d 14 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2011)
Covington v. State
555 S.E.2d 204 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2001)
Brent v. State
510 S.E.2d 14 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1998)
Wood v. State
462 S.E.2d 625 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1995)
Harper v. State
445 S.E.2d 563 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1994)
Hayes v. State
431 S.E.2d 430 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1993)
Hall v. State
409 S.E.2d 221 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1991)
Austin v. State
406 S.E.2d 500 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1991)
Alvarado v. State
403 S.E.2d 463 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1991)
Mendoza v. State
396 S.E.2d 576 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1990)
King v. State
391 S.E.2d 769 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1990)
Chance v. State
387 S.E.2d 437 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1989)
Moore v. State
367 S.E.2d 239 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1988)
Harrison v. Brunson (In Re Brunson)
82 B.R. 634 (S.D. Georgia, 1988)
Napier v. State
362 S.E.2d 501 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1987)
Schofill v. State
358 S.E.2d 651 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1987)
Fisher v. State
339 S.E.2d 744 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1986)
Stanfield v. State
336 S.E.2d 337 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
277 S.E.2d 60, 157 Ga. App. 264, 1981 Ga. App. LEXIS 1771, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lawrence-v-state-gactapp-1981.