Lawrence v. Greenwich Fire Insurance

New York Court of Chancery

Lawrence v. Greenwich Fire Insurance

1 Paige Ch. 587, 1829 N.Y. LEXIS 354, 1829 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 95

CourtNew York Court of Chancery

DecidedAugust 24, 1829

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 1 Paige Ch. 587 (Lawrence v. Greenwich Fire Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lawrence v. Greenwich Fire Insurance, 1 Paige Ch. 587, 1829 N.Y. LEXIS 354, 1829 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 95 (N.Y. 1829).

Pincite

Opinion

The Chancellor :—From the facts disclosed in the bill, answers and petition, it is evident there is no person at present authorized to take charge of and conduct the affairs, of the corporation. If those who own a majority of the stock neglect to elect directors to take charge of the property of the corporation, the minority are not to be the sufferers inconsequence of such neglect. Under these circumstances it is proper to appoint a receiver to take charge of the effects of the company, and preserve them for the benefit of the stockholders generally. The cases of Andrews v. Powis, (2 Brown’s P. C. 504,) and Maguire v. Allen, (1 Ball & Beat. 75,) fully sustain the principle that a receiver may be appointed in any case, where it is necessary for the preservation of the property pending litigation.

*It must be referred to a master to appoint a receiver with the usual powers, and to settle the amount of security -to be given, and to ascertain the sufficiency of the sureties offered. After the appointment is completed, the present .officers of the institution., if any .there are, and all former officers, must deliver .over, upon oath, under the direction of the master, all books, vouchers, property or effects in their hands, or within their power or control, belonging to the company.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Chancellor :—From the facts disclosed in the bill, answers and petition, it is evident there is no person at present authorized to take charge of and conduct the affairs, of the corporation. If those who own a majority of the stock neglect to elect directors to take charge of the property of the corporation, the minority are not to be the sufferers inconsequence of such neglect. Under these circumstances it is proper to appoint a receiver to take charge of the effects of the company, and preserve them for the benefit of the stockholders generally. The cases of Andrews v. Powis, (2 Brown’s P. C. 504,) and Maguire v. Allen, (1 Ball & Beat. 75,) fully sustain the principle that a receiver may be appointed in any case, where it is necessary for the preservation of the property pending litigation.

*It must be referred to a master to appoint a receiver with the usual powers, and to settle the amount of security -to be given, and to ascertain the sufficiency of the sureties offered. After the appointment is completed, the present .officers of the institution., if any .there are, and all former officers, must deliver .over, upon oath, under the direction of the master, all books, vouchers, property or effects in their hands, or within their power or control, belonging to the company.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Paige Ch. 587, 1829 N.Y. LEXIS 354, 1829 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 95, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lawrence-v-greenwich-fire-insurance-nychanct-1829.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack