Schmidt v. Johnson

166 Ill. App. 622, 1912 Ill. App. LEXIS 1338
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedJanuary 16, 1912
DocketGen. No. 18,092
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 166 Ill. App. 622 (Schmidt v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schmidt v. Johnson, 166 Ill. App. 622, 1912 Ill. App. LEXIS 1338 (Ill. Ct. App. 1912).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Clark

delivered the opinion of the court.

There is brought up for review by this appeal and by the one which follows it, No. 18093, the action of the Circuit Court of Cook County, in chancery, in appointing a receiver of the Fidelity Amusement Company and also a receiver of the Riverview Park Company.

The two appeals were heard together in this court, and for convenience the facts hearing upon the case are more fully considered in the opinion rendered this day in the case last mentioned, being on the appeal of the Riverview Park Company. (Post, p. 623.) For the reasons stated in that opinion, we think no error was committed by the chancellor in appointing a receiver of the Fidelity Amusement Company, and his action in that respect is approved and the order affirmed.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Keller v. Rodie
61 N.E.2d 387 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1945)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
166 Ill. App. 622, 1912 Ill. App. LEXIS 1338, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schmidt-v-johnson-illappct-1912.