Lawrence N. Brandt v. A. James Robertson

D.C. Circuit

Lawrence N. Brandt v. A. James Robertson

266 F.2d 456, 105 U.S. App. D.C. 255, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 4087

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedApril 9, 1959

Docket14695_1

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 266 F.2d 456 (Lawrence N. Brandt v. A. James Robertson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lawrence N. Brandt v. A. James Robertson, 266 F.2d 456, 105 U.S. App. D.C. 255, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 4087 (D.C. Cir. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In his complaint, plaintiff-appellee charged that defendants-appellants had trespassed upon his real property. The defense was that defendants had acquired title by adverse possession, as well as by deed from persons other than plaintiff. The District Court, after a lengthy hearing in which the judge was sole trier of the facts, gave judgment for the plaintiff, with injunctive relief. The evidence of adverse possession presented by the defendants was, at most, equivocal. The findings of the District Court cannot be said to be clearly erroneous. We find no error.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In his complaint, plaintiff-appellee charged that defendants-appellants had trespassed upon his real property. The defense was that defendants had acquired title by adverse possession, as well as by deed from persons other than plaintiff. The District Court, after a lengthy hearing in which the judge was sole trier of the facts, gave judgment for the plaintiff, with injunctive relief. The evidence of adverse possession presented by the defendants was, at most, equivocal. The findings of the District Court cannot be said to be clearly erroneous. We find no error.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

266 F.2d 456, 105 U.S. App. D.C. 255, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 4087, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lawrence-n-brandt-v-a-james-robertson-cadc-1959.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack