Esther Belle Downs and Bernard Ralph Downs v. Food Town, Inc.

D.C. Circuit

Esther Belle Downs and Bernard Ralph Downs v. Food Town, Inc.

266 F.2d 456

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedMay 13, 1959

Docket14629_1

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 266 F.2d 456 (Esther Belle Downs and Bernard Ralph Downs v. Food Town, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Esther Belle Downs and Bernard Ralph Downs v. Food Town, Inc., 266 F.2d 456 (D.C. Cir. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiffs appeal from a judgment for the defendant, based upon a jury’s verdict, in an action for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by negligence in the operation of the defendant’s store. We find no error affecting substantial rights. Cf. Brown v. Capital Transit Co., 75 U.S.App.D.C, 337, 338, 127 F.2d 329, 330, certiorari denied, 1942, 317 U.S. 632, 63 S.Ct. 61, 87 L.Ed. 510.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiffs appeal from a judgment for the defendant, based upon a jury’s verdict, in an action for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by negligence in the operation of the defendant’s store. We find no error affecting substantial rights. Cf. Brown v. Capital Transit Co., 75 U.S.App.D.C, 337, 338, 127 F.2d 329, 330, certiorari denied, 1942, 317 U.S. 632, 63 S.Ct. 61, 87 L.Ed. 510.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

266 F.2d 456, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/esther-belle-downs-and-bernard-ralph-downs-v-food-town-inc-cadc-1959.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack