Law v. Fuller
66 A. 754, 217 Pa. 439, 1907 Pa. LEXIS 734
Opinion
This bill was by stockholders of a corporation against its president for an account, on the ground that he had procured a sale of the property of the company and had acquired possession thereof under circumstances that made him a trustee of the stockholders. There is no dispute as to the findings of fact. The law applicable to them is clearly stated by the learned judge of the common pleas, and on his opinion we affirm the decree at the cost of the appellant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Law v. Fuller, 66 A. 754, 217 Pa. 439, 1907 Pa. LEXIS 734 (Pa. 1907).
66 A. 754 (Law v. Fuller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In Re Westinghouse Securities Litigation
832 F. Supp. 989 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1993)
Recchion, Westinghouse Elec. Corp. v. Kirby
637 F. Supp. 1309 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1986)
General Electric Co. v. Hol-Gar Manufacturing Corp.
431 F. Supp. 881 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1977)
In the Matter of the Trimble Company, a Corporation. Appeal of William J. McMinn
479 F.2d 103 (Third Circuit, 1973)
Selheimer v. Manganese Corp. of America
224 A.2d 634 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1966)
Smith v. Brown-Borhek Co.
29 Pa. D. & C.2d 684 (Lehigh County Court of Common Pleas, 1963)
Ingebretsen v. Lenc
32 N.E.2d 329 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1941)
Union Ice Co. of Philadelphia v. Hulton
140 A. 514 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1927)