Law Office of Sara Lawrence, P.A. v. Livingston

702 So. 2d 616, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 14048, 1997 WL 770590
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 17, 1997·No. No. 97-0336·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Sara Lawrence, of Sara Lawrence, P.A., the former attorney for the husband in the underlying dissolution action, appeals the trial court’s order denying her motion to enforce a valid charging lien. We reverse the order because a summary proceeding in the original action represents the preferred method of enforcing an attorney’s charging lien in Florida. Zimmerman v. Livnat, 507 So.2d 1205 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987). When the validity and amount of an attorney’s charging lien are clearly and emphatically settled, as they were here, it is the duty of the trial court to enforce the lien by summary proceeding in the underlying action. Edward C. Tietig, P.A. v. Southeast Reg’l Constr. Corp., 617 So.2d 761 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

GLICKSTEIN, GUNTHER and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Law Office of Sara Lawrence, P.A. v. Livingston, 702 So. 2d 616, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 14048, 1997 WL 770590 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

702 So. 2d 616 (Law Office of Sara Lawrence, P.A. v. Livingston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kuvin & Stettin, P.A. v. Wong
752 So. 2d 1269 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Boose, Casey, Ciklin, Lubitz, Martens, McBane & O'Connell v. Guardianship of Runco
741 So. 2d 1219 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Henderson v. Reyes
702 So. 2d 616 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)