Kuvin & Stettin, P.A. v. Wong

752 So. 2d 1269, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 2736, 2000 WL 276044
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 15, 2000·No. No. 4D99-1363·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Kuvin & Stettin, P.A. appeals the trial court’s order denying its motion to enforce a charging lien against its former client, Carolyn D. Lowe. We reverse the order because the trial court, having determined appellant’s entitlement to an attorney’s charging lien, had a duty to enforce the lien by summary proceeding in the underlying action. Law Office of Sara Lawrence, P.A. v. Livingston, 702 So.2d 616 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997); Edward C. Tietig, P.A. v. Southeast Reg’l Constr. Corp., 617 So.2d 761 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); Zimmerman v. Livnat, 507 So.2d 1205 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987). We remand with directions to the trial court to allow enforcement of the attorney’s charging lien in this cause.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

GUNTHER, TAYLOR and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kuvin & Stettin, P.A. v. Wong, 752 So. 2d 1269, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 2736, 2000 WL 276044 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

752 So. 2d 1269 (Kuvin & Stettin, P.A. v. Wong) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Edward C. Tietig, Pa v. Southeast Reg. Const. Corp.
617 So. 2d 761 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Zimmerman v. Livnat
507 So. 2d 1205 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Law Office of Sara Lawrence, P.A. v. Livingston
702 So. 2d 616 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)