Kuvin & Stettin, P.A. v. Wong

752 So. 2d 1269, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 2736, 2000 WL 276044
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 15, 2000
DocketNo. 4D99-1363
StatusPublished

This text of 752 So. 2d 1269 (Kuvin & Stettin, P.A. v. Wong) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kuvin & Stettin, P.A. v. Wong, 752 So. 2d 1269, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 2736, 2000 WL 276044 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Kuvin & Stettin, P.A. appeals the trial court’s order denying its motion to enforce a charging lien against its former client, Carolyn D. Lowe. We reverse the order because the trial court, having determined appellant’s entitlement to an attorney’s charging lien, had a duty to enforce the lien by summary proceeding in the underlying action. Law Office of Sara Lawrence, P.A. v. Livingston, 702 So.2d 616 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997); Edward C. Tietig, P.A. v. Southeast Reg’l Constr. Corp., 617 So.2d 761 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); Zimmerman v. Livnat, 507 So.2d 1205 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987). We remand with directions to the trial court to allow enforcement of the attorney’s charging lien in this cause.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

GUNTHER, TAYLOR and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Edward C. Tietig, Pa v. Southeast Reg. Const. Corp.
617 So. 2d 761 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Zimmerman v. Livnat
507 So. 2d 1205 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Law Office of Sara Lawrence, P.A. v. Livingston
702 So. 2d 616 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
752 So. 2d 1269, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 2736, 2000 WL 276044, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kuvin-stettin-pa-v-wong-fladistctapp-2000.