Lavender v. City of Tuscaloosa

198 So. 461, 29 Ala. App. 508, 1940 Ala. App. LEXIS 69
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedAugust 6, 1940
Docket6 Div. 589.
StatusPublished

This text of 198 So. 461 (Lavender v. City of Tuscaloosa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lavender v. City of Tuscaloosa, 198 So. 461, 29 Ala. App. 508, 1940 Ala. App. LEXIS 69 (Ala. Ct. App. 1940).

Opinion

BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.

From an examination of the record,, briefs of counsel, etc., in this case we find it in every respect identical with the case of Cleveland Lavender v. City of Tuscaloosa, 198 So. 459, 1 which case having been-, considered and determined by this court, present term, and a judgment of affirmance ordered, we need not write further in the-case at bar; except to order and adjudge-that the judgment of the lower court, from, which this appeal was taken, be affirmed, upon authority of the case of Cleveland. Lavender v. City of Tuscaloosa, supra.

Affirmed.

1

Ante, p. 502.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lavender v. City of Tuscaloosa
198 So. 459 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
198 So. 461, 29 Ala. App. 508, 1940 Ala. App. LEXIS 69, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lavender-v-city-of-tuscaloosa-alactapp-1940.