Lautenbacher v. Philadelphia

66 A. 549, 217 Pa. 318, 1907 Pa. LEXIS 707
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 1, 1907·No. Appeal, No. 298·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

By carrying the couch in the way she did, the appellant voluntarily impeded her view and disabled herself from the proper performance of her duty to look where she was going. She might as well have put a bandage over her eyes and then charged the city with the results of her failure to see the obstruction over which she fell.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lautenbacher v. Philadelphia, 66 A. 549, 217 Pa. 318, 1907 Pa. LEXIS 707 (Pa. 1907).

66 A. 549 (Lautenbacher v. Philadelphia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nicolls v. Scranton Club
208 F.2d 874 (Third Circuit, 1954)
Nicolls v. Scranton Club
111 F. Supp. 145 (M.D. Pennsylvania, 1953)
Bowland v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.
39 A.2d 619 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1944)
Malloy v. Castle Shannon Borough
25 A.2d 722 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1942)
Markman v. Fred P. Bell Stores Co.
132 A. 178 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1925)