Laub v. Zaslavsky
This text of 565 A.2d 158 (Laub v. Zaslavsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Karen LAUB, Appellant,
v.
Stanley ZASLAVSKY.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Joel E. Oshtry, Norman A. Oshtry, Philadelphia, for appellant.
*103 John A. Kane, Chief Counsel, Mary B. Seiverling, Asst. Counsel, Harrisburg, for amicus curiae, Comm., Dept. of Public Welfare, Bureau of Child Support Enforcement.
Dennis P. Talty, Philadelphia, for appellee.
Before NIX, C.J., and LARSEN, FLAHERTY, McDERMOTT, ZAPPALA and PAPADAKOS, JJ.
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
Order affirmed.
LARSEN and McDERMOTT, JJ., dissent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
565 A.2d 158, 523 Pa. 102, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/laub-v-zaslavsky-pa-1989.