Laton v. Balcom

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Laton v. Balcom

50 A. 100, 70 N.H. 635

CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire

DecidedDecember 5, 1900

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 50 A. 100 (Laton v. Balcom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Laton v. Balcom, 50 A. 100, 70 N.H. 635 (N.H. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

Parsons, J.

The controversy as to the title cannot be settled without a determination of the validity of the tax title under' which the defendant claims. This cannot be decided until it is found who was the occupant of the locus at the time of the sale. Upon this question the case contains evidence only. It is not advisable to attempt to pass upon the legal questions presented by the remaining facts until this fact is found. Fellows v. Fellows, 68 N. H. 611; State v. Railroad, ante, p. 421.

Case discharged.

Peaslee, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Parsons, J.

The controversy as to the title cannot be settled without a determination of the validity of the tax title under' which the defendant claims. This cannot be decided until it is found who was the occupant of the locus at the time of the sale. Upon this question the case contains evidence only. It is not advisable to attempt to pass upon the legal questions presented by the remaining facts until this fact is found. Fellows v. Fellows, 68 N. H. 611; State v. Railroad, ante, p. 421.

Case discharged.

Peaslee, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 A. 100, 70 N.H. 635, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/laton-v-balcom-nh-1900.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack