Fellows v. Fellows

44 A. 752, 68 N.H. 611
Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided June 5, 1896·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Carpenter, C. J.

All the questions reserved might not arise if the facts were found. Some of them, possibly all of them, might turn out to be immaterial. It often happens that grave and difficult questions of law arise upon pleadings, especially when they are of the character of those in these cases, which disappear upon an investigation of the facts. In these cases, it is clear that the facts should be found before an attempt is made to settle the law controlling the rights of the parties.

Case discharged.

Chase, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fellows v. Fellows, 44 A. 752, 68 N.H. 611 (N.H. 1896).

44 A. 752 (Fellows v. Fellows) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lemire v. Haley
23 A.2d 769 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1942)
Fitzhugh v. Grand Trunk Railway Co.
115 A. 803 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1921)
Connecticut Valley Lumber Co. v. Monroe
52 A. 940 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1902)
Champollion v. Corbin
51 A. 674 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1901)
Laton v. Balcom
50 A. 100 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1900)
State v. Manchester & Lawrence Railroad
48 A. 1103 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1900)