Home/Supreme Court/Lathan v. New York

Lathan v. New York

378 U.S. 566, 84 S. Ct. 1923, 12 L. Ed. 2d 1038, 1964 U.S. LEXIS 853
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJune 22, 1964
Docket298 M
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 378 U.S. 566 (Lathan v. New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lathan v. New York, 378 U.S. 566, 84 S. Ct. 1923, 12 L. Ed. 2d 1038, 1964 U.S. LEXIS 853 (1964).

Opinion

378 U.S. 566 (1964)

LATHAN
v.
NEW YORK.

No. 298, Misc.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided June 22, 1964.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.

Murray A. Gordon for petitioner.

Isidore Dollinger and Bertram R. Gelfand for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals of the State of New York is vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion of this Court in Jackson v. Denno, ante, p. 368.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK, MR. JUSTICE CLARK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Jackson v. Denno, supra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States of America Ex Rel. Caswell Lathan, Jr. v. John Deegan, Superintendent of Auburn Correctional Facility, Auburn, New York
450 F.2d 181 (Second Circuit, 1971)
State v. Ussery
452 S.W.2d 146 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1970)
Commonwealth Ex Rel. Butler v. Rundle
206 A.2d 283 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1965)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
378 U.S. 566, 84 S. Ct. 1923, 12 L. Ed. 2d 1038, 1964 U.S. LEXIS 853, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lathan-v-new-york-scotus-1964.