Latham v. State

554 S.W.3d 397
Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided September 11, 2018·No. No. SC 96315·Published·Cited by 26 cases

Opinion

Conclusion

A presumption of abandonment arose when Mr. Latham's postconviction counsel failed to file either an amended motion or a statement in lieu of an amended motion within Rule 24.035(g)'s 60-day deadline. The motion court's judgment is reversed, and the case is remanded.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Latham v. State, 554 S.W.3d 397 (Mo. 2018).

554 S.W.3d 397 (Latham v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State of Missouri v. David F. Schneider
Missouri Court of Appeals, 2023
JOHNNY LEE COOPER v. STATE OF MISSOURI
Missouri Court of Appeals, 2023
Jordan Medlin v. State of Missouri
Missouri Court of Appeals, 2023
Donald Nussbaum v. State of Missouri
Missouri Court of Appeals, 2023
Jerry A. Harley v. State of Missouri
Missouri Court of Appeals, 2021
ROBERT J. BRANSON v. STATE OF MISSOURI
Missouri Court of Appeals, 2021
Steven Earl v. State of Missouri
Missouri Court of Appeals, 2021
Shania A. Harness v. State of Missouri
Missouri Court of Appeals, 2020
Ronald Johnson v. State of Missouri
Supreme Court of Missouri, 2019