Latham v. State

554 S.W.3d 397
CourtSupreme Court of Missouri
DecidedSeptember 11, 2018
DocketNo. SC 96315
StatusPublished
Cited by26 cases

This text of 554 S.W.3d 397 (Latham v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Latham v. State, 554 S.W.3d 397 (Mo. 2018).

Opinion

Conclusion

A presumption of abandonment arose when Mr. Latham's postconviction counsel failed to file either an amended motion or a statement in lieu of an amended motion within Rule 24.035(g)'s 60-day deadline. The motion court's judgment is reversed, and the case is remanded.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State of Missouri v. David F. Schneider
Missouri Court of Appeals, 2023
JOHNNY LEE COOPER v. STATE OF MISSOURI
Missouri Court of Appeals, 2023
Jordan Medlin v. State of Missouri
Missouri Court of Appeals, 2023
Donald Nussbaum v. State of Missouri
Missouri Court of Appeals, 2023
Jerry A. Harley v. State of Missouri
Missouri Court of Appeals, 2021
ROBERT J. BRANSON v. STATE OF MISSOURI
Missouri Court of Appeals, 2021
Steven Earl v. State of Missouri
Missouri Court of Appeals, 2021
Shania A. Harness v. State of Missouri
Missouri Court of Appeals, 2020
Ronald Johnson v. State of Missouri
Supreme Court of Missouri, 2019

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
554 S.W.3d 397, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/latham-v-state-mo-2018.