Lasswell v. Matlack, Inc.
This text of 532 So. 2d 104 (Lasswell v. Matlack, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Nonie LASSWELL
v.
MATLACK, INC.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Denied.
LEMMON, J., votes to grant. In this bifurcated trial, the judge assigned zero per cent fault to the Department, and the jury attributed seventy per cent fault to the driver. These conflicting judgments decided only seventy per cent of the fault. The court of appeal, 527 So.2d 1199, should have reconciled the conflicting judgments *105 on the basis of an independent review of the record, without resort to the manifest error rule. Since the judgments are conflicting, neither is entitled to be accorded the manifest error rule.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
532 So. 2d 104, 1988 WL 110621, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lasswell-v-matlack-inc-la-1988.