Lassiter v. Alabama

19 F.3d 1370, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 9451
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lassiter v. Alabama. Read the opinion of the Court — 28 F.3d 1146
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided April 14, 1994·No. 92-6295·Published

Opinion

19 F.3d 1370

91 Ed. Law Rep. 847

Albert E. LASSITER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
ALABAMA A & M UNIVERSITY, BOARD OF TRUSTEES; Douglas
Covington; Thomas Fuller; Herbert Gray; Robert
T. Hughes; W. Troy Massey; Eddie
Player, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 92-6295.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit.

April 14, 1994.

Susan Williams Reeves, Birmingham, AL, for appellant.

Joe R. Whatley, Jr., Cooper, Mitch, Crawford, Kuykendall & Whatley, John C. Falkenberry, Birmingham, AL, for appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama (No. CV-86-HM-5453-NE); E.B. Haltom, Jr., Judge.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion October 7, 1993, 11th Cir., 1993, 3 F.3d 1482)

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK and CARNES, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lassiter v. Alabama, 19 F.3d 1370, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 9451 (11th Cir. 1994).

19 F.3d 1370 (Lassiter v. Alabama) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.