Lassiter v. Alabama
This text of 19 F.3d 1370 (Lassiter v. Alabama) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
19 F.3d 1370
91 Ed. Law Rep. 847
Albert E. LASSITER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
ALABAMA A & M UNIVERSITY, BOARD OF TRUSTEES; Douglas
Covington; Thomas Fuller; Herbert Gray; Robert
T. Hughes; W. Troy Massey; Eddie
Player, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 92-6295.
United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit.
April 14, 1994.
Susan Williams Reeves, Birmingham, AL, for appellant.
Joe R. Whatley, Jr., Cooper, Mitch, Crawford, Kuykendall & Whatley, John C. Falkenberry, Birmingham, AL, for appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama (No. CV-86-HM-5453-NE); E.B. Haltom, Jr., Judge.
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
(Opinion October 7, 1993, 11th Cir., 1993, 3 F.3d 1482)
Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK and CARNES, Circuit Judges.
BY THE COURT:
A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
19 F.3d 1370, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 9451, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lassiter-v-alabama-ca11-1994.