Lask v. Bedell, Inc.
109 A. 849, 91 N.J. Eq. 341, 6 Stock. 341, 1920 N.J. LEXIS 299
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Lane.
For affirmance — Tss Chibe-Justice, Teenchaeb, Parker, JBergejST, Mihturn, Kalisoh, Black, White, HeppbhSeimer, Williams, Taylor, Aokersoh — 12.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lask v. Bedell, Inc., 109 A. 849, 91 N.J. Eq. 341, 6 Stock. 341, 1920 N.J. LEXIS 299 (N.J. 1920).
109 A. 849 (Lask v. Bedell, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Estate of Fortunato v. Comm'r
2010 T.C. Memo. 105 (U.S. Tax Court, 2010)
Leighton v. NEW YORK, SUSQUEHANNA & WESTERN RAILROAD CO.
303 F. Supp. 599 (S.D. New York, 1969)
Warren v. New Jersey Zinc Co.
173 A. 128 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1934)
Harld Holding Co. v. Laird
136 A. 731 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1927)