LaRue v. Matheney

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in LaRue v. Matheney. Read the opinion of the Court — 385 F. App'x 328
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 28, 2010·No. 10-6479·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6479

WILLIAM ALLEN LARUE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CAPT. RUSSELL MATHENEY; CHRISTY FLORES, In their Official Capacity,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. David A. Faber, Senior District Judge. (2:08-cv-00983)

Submitted: June 17, 2010 Decided: June 28, 2010

Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Allen LaRue, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

William A. LaRue appeals the district court’s order

adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. LaRue v. Matheney, No. 2:08-cv-00983

(S.D.W. Va. Mar. 4, 2010). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LaRue v. Matheney, (4th Cir. 2010).

LaRue v. Matheney (LaRue v. Matheney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Screening
28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)