LaRue v. Matheney
This text of LaRue v. Matheney (LaRue v. Matheney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6479
WILLIAM ALLEN LARUE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CAPT. RUSSELL MATHENEY; CHRISTY FLORES, In their Official Capacity,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. David A. Faber, Senior District Judge. (2:08-cv-00983)
Submitted: June 17, 2010 Decided: June 28, 2010
Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Allen LaRue, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
William A. LaRue appeals the district court’s order
adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. LaRue v. Matheney, No. 2:08-cv-00983
(S.D.W. Va. Mar. 4, 2010). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
LaRue v. Matheney, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/larue-v-matheney-ca4-2010.