Larsson v. Mithallal

72 A.D.2d 806, 421 N.Y.S.2d 922, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14075
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 26, 1979
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 72 A.D.2d 806 (Larsson v. Mithallal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Larsson v. Mithallal, 72 A.D.2d 806, 421 N.Y.S.2d 922, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14075 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Opinion

In a medical malpractice action, defendant Jewish Memorial Hospital appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated February 26, 1979, which, upon the plaintiff’s motion, inter alia, directed that it produce two named individuals for deposition. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. The examination before trial shall proceed at the place designated in the order under review at a time to be fixed by plaintiff in a written notice of not less than 10 days, or at such other time and place as the parties may agree. In the instant malpractice action the plaintiff seeks damages for injuries stemming from an operation performed by defendant Dr. Mithallal at the defendant Jewish Memorial Hospital (Hospital). With respect to the Hospital, it is alleged, inter alia, that it was negligent in affording Dr. Mithallal staff privileges without inquiring into his background or credentials. Special Term, in the order appealed from, directed the Hospital to produce two named witnesses for deposition in connection with plaintiff’s claim of negligence in the staff-selection process. We see no reason to disturb Special Term’s order. We note, however, that section 6527 of the Education Law expressly precludes plaintiff from questioning the deponents with respect to the proceedings of the Hospital’s credentials committee. That body, which apparently approved the appointment of Dr. Mithallal, performed a "medical review function” within the meaning of section 6527. Rabin, J. P., Cohalan, Margett and Gibbons, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stalker v. Abraham
69 A.D.3d 1172 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Finnegan v. State
179 Misc. 2d 694 (New York State Court of Claims, 1999)
Van Caloen v. Poglinco
214 A.D.2d 555 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Parker v. St. Clare's Hospital
159 A.D.2d 919 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Fay v. Wang
116 A.D.2d 553 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
Daly v. Genovese
96 A.D.2d 1027 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Palmer v. City of Rome
120 Misc. 2d 558 (New York Supreme Court, 1983)
Kiefer v. John T. Mather Memorial Hospital
93 A.D.2d 856 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Carroll v. St. Luke's Hospital of Newburgh
91 A.D.2d 674 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
Burnside v. Foot Clinics
115 Misc. 2d 85 (New York Supreme Court, 1982)
Wiener v. Memorial Hospital for Cancer & Allied Diseases
114 Misc. 2d 1013 (New York Supreme Court, 1982)
Silva v. State
109 Misc. 2d 809 (New York State Court of Claims, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
72 A.D.2d 806, 421 N.Y.S.2d 922, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14075, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/larsson-v-mithallal-nyappdiv-1979.