Fay v. Wang

116 A.D.2d 553, 498 N.Y.S.2d 309, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51407

This text of 116 A.D.2d 553 (Fay v. Wang) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fay v. Wang, 116 A.D.2d 553, 498 N.Y.S.2d 309, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51407 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Opinion

— In an action to recover damages, inter alia,

for personal injuries predicated upon medical malpractice, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Isseks, J.), dated December 3, 1984, which granted defendants’ motion to quash a notice for discovery.

Order affirmed, with costs to respondent St. Francis Hospital of Port Jervis.

Discovery of the material requested is prohibited under Education Law § 6527 (see, Larsson v Mithallal, 72 AD2d 806; Kiefer v Mather Mem. Hosp., 93 AD2d 856). Lazer, J. P., Bracken, Niehoff and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Larsson v. Mithallal
72 A.D.2d 806 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)
Kiefer v. John T. Mather Memorial Hospital
93 A.D.2d 856 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
116 A.D.2d 553, 498 N.Y.S.2d 309, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51407, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fay-v-wang-nyappdiv-1986.