Fay v. Wang

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Fay v. Wang

116 A.D.2d 553, 498 N.Y.S.2d 309, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51407

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 13, 1986·Published

Opinion

— In an action to recover damages, inter alia,

for personal injuries predicated upon medical malpractice, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Isseks, J.), dated December 3, 1984, which granted defendants’ motion to quash a notice for discovery.

Order affirmed, with costs to respondent St. Francis Hospital of Port Jervis.

Discovery of the material requested is prohibited under Education Law § 6527 (see, Larsson v Mithallal, 72 AD2d 806; Kiefer v Mather Mem. Hosp., 93 AD2d 856). Lazer, J. P., Bracken, Niehoff and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In an action to recover damages, inter alia,

for personal injuries predicated upon medical malpractice, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Isseks, J.), dated December 3, 1984, which granted defendants’ motion to quash a notice for discovery.

Order affirmed, with costs to respondent St. Francis Hospital of Port Jervis.

Discovery of the material requested is prohibited under Education Law § 6527 (see, Larsson v Mithallal, 72 AD2d 806; Kiefer v Mather Mem. Hosp., 93 AD2d 856). Lazer, J. P., Bracken, Niehoff and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Fay v. Wang, 116 A.D.2d 553, 498 N.Y.S.2d 309, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51407 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

116 A.D.2d 553 (Fay v. Wang) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related