Larson v. Slette

146 N.W. 1095, 125 Minn. 270
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Larson v. Slette. Read the opinion of the Court — 125 Minn. 266
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided April 24, 1914·No. Nos. 18,448 — (36)·Published

Opinion

Dibell, C.

The defendant appeals from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

The case was tried to the Gourt without a jury. The court found that in March, 1906, one Louis Iverson came into possession of a check for $99.90 which belonged to the plaintiff; that the defendant Slette represented himself to be the agent of the plaintiff Larson, and authorized Iverson to retain the money for his own use; that Iverson did retain it; that Iverson was at all times insolvent; that Slette at no time had authority from the plaintiff to direct the application of the money; and that because of such representation and the appropriation of the money by Iverson the plaintiff lost it.

The evidence is in dispute and the findings are justified.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Larson v. Slette, 146 N.W. 1095, 125 Minn. 270 (Mich. 1914).

146 N.W. 1095 (Larson v. Slette) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.