Larson v. Slette

146 N.W. 1094, 125 Minn. 266, 1914 Minn. LEXIS 751
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedApril 24, 1914
DocketNos. 18,445 — (33)
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 146 N.W. 1094 (Larson v. Slette) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Larson v. Slette, 146 N.W. 1094, 125 Minn. 266, 1914 Minn. LEXIS 751 (Mich. 1914).

Opinion

Dibell, C.

The defendant appeals from the order denying his motion for a new trial.

The court finds that on December 16, 1906, the plaintiffs Larson and Eosholt, the defendant Slette, and L. B. Larson, and J. B. Messner, executed a note for $5,000 to the Osseo State Bank, due December 1, 1907. At the maturity of the note each of the plaintiffs paid $1,250. The State Bank of Halstad, at the request of the plain[267]*267tiffs, paid $2,500, and the plaintiffs are now liable to the bank for it. The Osseo bank surrendered and discharged the $5,000 note, and the defendant is not liable upon it. Under such facts the defendant •is liable to the plaintiffs.

A careful examination of the evidence shows that the findings are justified; and there are no facts other than those recited controlling the determination of the case.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tucker v. Nicholson
84 P.2d 1045 (California Supreme Court, 1938)
Barton v. Farmers' State Bank
276 S.W. 177 (Texas Commission of Appeals, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
146 N.W. 1094, 125 Minn. 266, 1914 Minn. LEXIS 751, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/larson-v-slette-minn-1914.