Larsen v. Ciolli

2018 NY Slip Op 7299
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 31, 2018
Docket2016-03146
StatusPublished

This text of 2018 NY Slip Op 7299 (Larsen v. Ciolli) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Larsen v. Ciolli, 2018 NY Slip Op 7299 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

Larsen v Ciolli (2018 NY Slip Op 07299)
Larsen v Ciolli
2018 NY Slip Op 07299
Decided on October 31, 2018
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on October 31, 2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
RUTH C. BALKIN, J.P.
SANDRA L. SGROI
HECTOR D. LASALLE
BETSY BARROS, JJ.

2016-03146
(Index No. 150771/13)

[*1]Robert Larsen, respondent,

v

Frank Ciolli, doing business as Grimaldi's Pizzeria, appellant, et al., defendants.


McCue Sussmane Zapfel Cohen & Youbi, P.C., New York, NY (Kenneth S. Sussmane of counsel), for appellant.

Gerald J. McMahon, New York, NY, for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendant Frank Ciolli, doing business as Grimaldi's Pizzeria, appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Charles M. Troia, J.), dated January 15, 2016. The order denied that defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the breach of contract and fraud causes of action insofar as asserted against him.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The appeal must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of a judgment in the action dated November 30, 2016 (see Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248). The issues raised on the appeal from the order, to the extent that they have not been rendered academic, are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment (Larsen v Ciolli,_____ AD3d _____ [Appellate Division Docket No. 2016-13318; decided herewith]; see CPLR 5501[a][1]; Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d at 248).

BALKIN, J.P., SGROI, LASALLE and BARROS, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Aho
347 N.E.2d 647 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2018 NY Slip Op 7299, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/larsen-v-ciolli-nyappdiv-2018.