Alliance National Insurance v. Absolut Facilities Management, LLC

140 A.D.3d 810, 31 N.Y.S.3d 896
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 8, 2016
Docket2014-04132
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 140 A.D.3d 810 (Alliance National Insurance v. Absolut Facilities Management, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alliance National Insurance v. Absolut Facilities Management, LLC, 140 A.D.3d 810, 31 N.Y.S.3d 896 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Bucaria, J.), entered June 5, 2014, which, upon an order of the same court dated March 17, 2014, granting the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on the complaint, is in favor of the plaintiff and against it in the principal sum of $377,598.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The essential elements of a cause of action to recover damages for breach of contract are the existence of a contract, the plaintiffs performance pursuant to the contract, the defendant’s breach of its contractual obligations, and damages resulting from the breach (see Legum v Russo, 133 AD3d 638, 639 [2015]). In support of its motion for summary judgment, the plaintiff established its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]).

In opposition, the defendant failed to raise a triable issue of fact. There is a presumption of the legality of a contract (see Brearton v De Witt, 252 NY 495, 500 [1930]) and, contrary to the defendant’s contention, it failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether the contract was illegal. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on the complaint ánd awarded the plaintiff the damages it sought.

Rivera, J.R, Dickerson, Maltese and Bar-ros, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fernandez v. Abatayo
2019 NY Slip Op 3571 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Larsen v. Ciolli
2018 NY Slip Op 7300 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Johnston v. Wisdom Fin. E. Coast Leasing
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018
IPFS Corp. v. Manetta Enters., Inc.
2018 NY Slip Op 2449 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
All Seasons Fuels, Inc. v. Morgan Fuel & Heating Co., Inc.
2017 NY Slip Op 8499 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Fairlane Financial Corp. v. Longspaugh
2016 NY Slip Op 7620 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Village of Kiryas Joel v. County of Orange
2016 NY Slip Op 7640 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
140 A.D.3d 810, 31 N.Y.S.3d 896, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alliance-national-insurance-v-absolut-facilities-management-llc-nyappdiv-2016.