Larry Gene Anthony, II v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedDecember 4, 2019
DocketA20D0155
StatusPublished

This text of Larry Gene Anthony, II v. State (Larry Gene Anthony, II v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Larry Gene Anthony, II v. State, (Ga. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ November 25, 2019

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A20D0155. LARRY GENE ANTHONY, II v. THE STATE.

Larry Gene Anthony, II, was found guilty of speeding, and the trial court entered its initial sentence in March 2019. In August 2019, the trial court entered an amended sentence, requiring Anthony to serve his sentence on probation.1 On October 8, 2019, the trial court issued an arrest warrant, ordering that Anthony be brought before the court to answer an alleged violation of his probation. On November 1, 2019, Anthony filed this application for discretionary appeal of the arrest warrant. We lack jurisdiction. Because it appears that no final judgment has been entered in the probation proceeding and the case remains pending below, the arrest warrant is an interlocutory order. Although Anthony filed an application for discretionary appeal, as described in OCGA § 5-6-35,2 compliance with that procedure does not excuse a party seeking appellate review of an interlocutory order from complying with the interlocutory appeal procedures – including obtaining a certificate of immediate review from the trial court – set forth in OCGA § 5-6-34 (b). See Bailey v. Bailey, 266 Ga. 832, 832- 833 (471 SE2d 213) (1996); Scruggs v. Ga. Dept. of Human Resources, 261 Ga. 587, 588-589 (1) (408 SE2d 103) (1991). Anthony’s failure to follow the interlocutory

1 Anthony’s attempts to seek appellate review of his conviction and sentence have been dismissed as untimely. See Case No. A20A0325 (dismissed Sept. 19, 2019); Case No. A20D0087 (dismissed Oct. 16, 2019). 2 OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (5) provides that “orders revoking probation” are subject to the discretionary appeal procedure. (Emphasis supplied.) appeal procedures deprives this Court of jurisdiction over his application, which is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 11/25/2019 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bailey v. Bailey
471 S.E.2d 213 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1996)
Scruggs v. Georgia Department of Human Resources
408 S.E.2d 103 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Larry Gene Anthony, II v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/larry-gene-anthony-ii-v-state-gactapp-2019.