Larrivee v. Timmons

525 A.2d 1037, 1987 Me. LEXIS 733
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided May 20, 1987·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

Plaintiffs, residents and property owners in Windham, appeal an order of the Superi- or Court (Cumberland County) affirming a decision of the Windham Planning Board granting approval of a subdivision plan proposed by Arcadia Company. On appeal, plaintiffs make two contentions. First, the Board erroneously failed to issue explicit findings to support its decision. Second, the Board’s refusal to allow cross-examination and rebuttal evidence at the final hearing on Arcadia’s plan denied them due process. We hold that because the record reveals that the Board considered all the applicable criteria, the failure to issue findings is not reversible error. Cunningham v. Kittery Planning Board, 400 A.2d 1070, 1079 (Me.1979). We further hold that the record does not reveal a denial of due process.

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Larrivee v. Timmons, 525 A.2d 1037, 1987 Me. LEXIS 733 (Me. 1987).

525 A.2d 1037 (Larrivee v. Timmons) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Larrivee v. Timmons
549 A.2d 744 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1988)
Town of Windham v. Portland Water District
537 A.2d 216 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1988)