Larrivee v. Timmons
This text of 525 A.2d 1037 (Larrivee v. Timmons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.
Plaintiffs, residents and property owners in Windham, appeal an order of the Superi- or Court (Cumberland County) affirming a decision of the Windham Planning Board granting approval of a subdivision plan proposed by Arcadia Company. On appeal, plaintiffs make two contentions. First, the Board erroneously failed to issue explicit findings to support its decision. Second, the Board’s refusal to allow cross-examination and rebuttal evidence at the final hearing on Arcadia’s plan denied them due process. We hold that because the record reveals that the Board considered all the applicable criteria, the failure to issue findings is not reversible error. Cunningham v. Kittery Planning Board, 400 A.2d 1070, 1079 (Me.1979). We further hold that the record does not reveal a denial of due process.
The entry is:
Judgment affirmed.
All concurring.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
525 A.2d 1037, 1987 Me. LEXIS 733, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/larrivee-v-timmons-me-1987.