Larkin v. Wilson
This text of 106 Mass. 120 (Larkin v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Under the Rev. Sts. c. 109, it was decided that a foreign corporation was not liable to be summoned as a [121]*121trustee, though some of its principal officers resided here, and though it was the lessee of a railroad here, and employed agents here to manage the road. Danforth v. Penny, 3 Met. 564. Gold v. Housatonic Railroad Co. 1 Gray, 424. This construction of the statute would include a foreign insurance company doing business here in conformity with our statutes. The law was not changed in this respect by the Gen. Sts. c. 142, § 1. A change was made by the St. of 1870, c. 194, by which foreign corporations having a usual place of business here are made liable to the process. But the writ in this, case was served' before this statute was in force, and the question before us must be decided by the law then existing. Trustees discharged.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
106 Mass. 120, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/larkin-v-wilson-mass-1870.