Largent v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.

842 P.2d 447, 116 Or. App. 661, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 2297
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedDecember 2, 1992
Docket9006-03887; CA A69831
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 842 P.2d 447 (Largent v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Largent v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., 842 P.2d 447, 116 Or. App. 661, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 2297 (Or. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Plaintiff insured appeals from a summary judgment for defendant insurer in this action for intentional interference with business relationships arising from defendant’s denial of plaintiffs insurance claim and the resulting litigation. See Largent v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. (A71495), 116 Or App 595, 842 P2d 445 (1992). The evidence on which plaintiff relies to create a material question of fact about the existence of an improper motive or improper means has no tendency to show either. See Rossi v. State Farm Mutual Auto Ins. Co., 90 Or App 589, 752 P2d 1298, rev den 306 Or 414 (1988). Summary judgment was proper.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shaffer v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.
852 P.2d 245 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1993)
Largent v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Company
842 P.2d 447 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
842 P.2d 447, 116 Or. App. 661, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 2297, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/largent-v-state-farm-fire-casualty-co-orctapp-1992.