Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Largaespado v. State

Largaespado v. State

658 So. 2d 189, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 8688, 1995 WL 480554
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 16, 1995
DocketNo. 95-321
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 658 So. 2d 189 (Largaespado v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Largaespado v. State, 658 So. 2d 189, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 8688, 1995 WL 480554 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Upon the State’s proper confession of error, and because no evidence of the burglary was presented at the probation violation hearing, this cause is remanded to the trial court to enter a written order of Revocation of Probation in case # 94-671, strike the finding of violation as to condition 6 (the burglary charge) and make such redetermi-nation as may warranted, because the record is unclear as to whether the trial court would have revoked Defendant’s probation and given him the same sentence absent the violation of condition 6.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Scarlet v. State
766 So. 2d 1110 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Cheatham v. State
751 So. 2d 751 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
658 So. 2d 189, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 8688, 1995 WL 480554, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/largaespado-v-state-fladistctapp-1995.