Cheatham v. State
This text of 758 So. 2d 1130 (Cheatham v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING— GRANTED
We withdraw our previously issued opinion in this case and substitute the following in its place.
Appellant’s third issue on appeal argues that his judgment of conviction and sentence erroneously characterizes the offense charged in Count 1 of the Information, to which appellant pled no contest, as Burglary of an Occupied Structure, when the Information charges Burglary of an Unoccupied Structure.1 We agree and remand this case to the trial court with directions to correct this scrivener’s error in the judgment.
We affirm on all other claims.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
758 So. 2d 1130, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 358, 2000 WL 35895, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cheatham-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.