Lareau v. Order of United Commercial Travelers of America

6 N.Y.2d 764
New York Court of Appeals·Decided April 17, 1959·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order affirmed and judgment absolute directed against appellant on the stipulation, with costs in all courts. No opinion. (Burr v. Commercial Travelers Mut. Acc. Assn., 295 N. Y. 294, 301-303; McGrail v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc., 292 N. Y. 419, 424-425; Mansbacher v. Prudential Ins. Co., 273 N. Y. 140, 144; Silverstein v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 254 N. Y. 81, 84-85; Lewis v. Ocean Acc. & Guar. Corp., 224 N. Y. 18, 20-21.)

Concur: Chief Judge Conway and Judges Desmond, Dye, Fuld and Froessel. Judges Van Voorhis and Burke dissent and vote to reverse and dismiss the complaint on the authority of Wilcox v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. (265 N. Y. 665).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lareau v. Order of United Commercial Travelers of America, 6 N.Y.2d 764 (N.Y. 1959).

6 N.Y.2d 764 (Lareau v. Order of United Commercial Travelers of America) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lareau v. ORDER OF UNITED COMMERCIAL TRAVELERS OF AM.
159 N.E.2d 207 (New York Court of Appeals, 1959)