Lareau v. ORDER OF UNITED COMMERCIAL TRAVELERS OF AM.
This text of 159 N.E.2d 207 (Lareau v. ORDER OF UNITED COMMERCIAL TRAVELERS OF AM.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Francis E. Lareau, Respondent,
v.
Order of United Commercial Travelers of America, Appellant.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Herbert A. Steinke, Jr., for appellant.
Harvey M. Lifset and Elias Moubar for respondent.
Concur: Chief Judge CONWAY and Judges DESMOND, DYE, FULD and FROESSEL. Judges VAN VOORHIS and BURKE dissent and vote to reverse and dismiss the complaint on the authority of Wilcox v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. (265 N.Y. 665).
Order affirmed and judgment absolute directed against appellant on the stipulation, with costs in all courts. No opinion. (Burr v. Commercial Travelers Mut. Acc. Assn., 295 N.Y. 294, 301-303; McGrail v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc., 292 N.Y. 419, 424-425; Mansbacher v. Prudential Ins. Co., 273 N.Y. 140, 144; Silverstein v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 254 N.Y. 81, 84-85; Lewis v. Ocean Acc. & Guar. Corp., 224 N.Y. 18, 20-21.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
159 N.E.2d 207, 6 N.Y.2d 764, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lareau-v-order-of-united-commercial-travelers-of-a-ny-1959.