Laquish Kelly v. Douglas Jones

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJune 22, 2015
DocketA15D0429
StatusPublished

This text of Laquish Kelly v. Douglas Jones (Laquish Kelly v. Douglas Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Laquish Kelly v. Douglas Jones, (Ga. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ June 12, 2015

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15D0429. LAQUISH KELLY v. DOUGLAS JONES.

Laquish Kelly filed this application for discretionary appeal from the trial court’s order concerning, among other issues, the modification of visitation provisions in a consent order on legitimation and custody originally filed in 2011. Under OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (11), direct appeals are permitted from “[a]ll judgments or orders in child custody cases awarding, refusing to change, or modifying child custody or holding or declining to hold persons in contempt of such child custody judgments or orders.” And “[v]isitation is considered a custody issue.” Daniels v. Barnes, 289 Ga. App. 897, 899 n. 1 (658 SE2d 472) (2008); see also OCGA § 19-9- 41 (4) (defining “child custody proceeding” as “a proceeding in which legal custody, physical custody, or visitation with respect to a child is in issue.”). Thus, the order that Kelly seeks to appeal is directly appealable. The fact that Kelly wishes to challenge other portions of the trial court’s order, including child support, does not alter this conclusion. See Collins v. Davis, 318 Ga. App. 265, 266-269 (1) (733 SE2d 798) (2012) (if trial court’s order falls within scope of OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (11), then a direct appeal is authorized regardless of the issue raised on appeal). We will grant a timely discretionary application if the lower court’s order is subject to direct appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (j). Accordingly, this application is hereby GRANTED. Kelly shall have ten days from the date of this order to file a notice of appeal with the trial court. If, however, she has already filed a notice of appeal, she need not file a second notice. The clerk of the trial court is DIRECTED to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals. Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 06/12/2015 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Daniels v. Barnes
658 S.E.2d 472 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2008)
Collins v. Davis
733 S.E.2d 798 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Laquish Kelly v. Douglas Jones, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/laquish-kelly-v-douglas-jones-gactapp-2015.