Laposta v. Himmer
55 A.2d 751, 358 Pa. 69, 1947 Pa. LEXIS 480
Opinion
All of the alleged errors covered by the appellants’ assignments on this appeal were painstakingly considered and correctly disposed of by the learned court en banc. As nothing is to be gained by Our reiterating either the facts or the law, the judgment will be affirmed on the opinion of Judge Kennedy for the court below.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Laposta v. Himmer, 55 A.2d 751, 358 Pa. 69, 1947 Pa. LEXIS 480 (Pa. 1947).
55 A.2d 751 (Laposta v. Himmer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Eastern Contractors, Inc. v. Zinkand
86 A.2d 492 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1988)
Hladyshewski v. Robinson
557 F.2d 1251 (Eighth Circuit, 1977)
Carey v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.
237 A.2d 233 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1968)
Ridgway National Bank, Guardian of the Estate of Robert Aiello, a Mental Incompetent v. North American Van Lines, Inc., an Indiana Corporation
326 F.2d 934 (Third Circuit, 1964)
Kite v. Jones
132 A.2d 683 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1957)