Laposta v. Himmer

55 A.2d 751, 358 Pa. 69, 1947 Pa. LEXIS 480
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedOctober 2, 1947
DocketAppeal, 177
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 55 A.2d 751 (Laposta v. Himmer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Laposta v. Himmer, 55 A.2d 751, 358 Pa. 69, 1947 Pa. LEXIS 480 (Pa. 1947).

Opinion

■Pee Curiam,

All of the alleged errors covered by the appellants’ assignments on this appeal were painstakingly considered and correctly disposed of by the learned court en banc. As nothing is to be gained by Our reiterating either the facts or the law, the judgment will be affirmed on the opinion of Judge Kennedy for the court below.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Eastern Contractors, Inc. v. Zinkand
86 A.2d 492 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1988)
Hladyshewski v. Robinson
557 F.2d 1251 (Eighth Circuit, 1977)
Carey v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.
237 A.2d 233 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1968)
Kite v. Jones
132 A.2d 683 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1957)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
55 A.2d 751, 358 Pa. 69, 1947 Pa. LEXIS 480, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/laposta-v-himmer-pa-1947.