Lanzy v. Harrison

51 F. App'x 921
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedDecember 9, 2002
Docket02-7549
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 51 F. App'x 921 (Lanzy v. Harrison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lanzy v. Harrison, 51 F. App'x 921 (4th Cir. 2002).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Lawrence Gene Lanzy seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). We have reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons stated by the district court that Lanzy has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See Lanzy v. Harrison, No. CA-01-3652-24BH-4 (D.S.C. Sept. 25, *922 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We also deny Lanzy’s “Motion to Accept Exhibit Evidence.” We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lanzy v. Warden Harrison
538 U.S. 1015 (Supreme Court, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
51 F. App'x 921, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lanzy-v-harrison-ca4-2002.