Lansing v. Lansing

New York Supreme Court

Lansing v. Lansing

8 Johns. 454

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 15, 1811

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 8 Johns. 454 (Lansing v. Lansing) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lansing v. Lansing, 8 Johns. 454 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1811).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff below took the note, after it had become due, and subject, therefore, to every defence which existed against it, in the hands of the original payee. This case falls within the principle laid down in Bunn v. Piker, (4 Johns. Rep. 426.) that a bet involving an inquiry into the validity of the election of the governor, was void, on principles of policy. The, judgment below must be reversed.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff below took the note, after it had become due, and subject, therefore, to every defence which existed against it, in the hands of the original payee. This case falls within the principle laid down in Bunn v. Piker, (4 Johns. Rep. 426.) that a bet involving an inquiry into the validity of the election of the governor, was void, on principles of policy. The, judgment below must be reversed.

Judgment reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 Johns. 454, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lansing-v-lansing-nysupct-1811.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack