Lanier v. Bailey

48 S.E. 324, 120 Ga. 878, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 731
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided August 10, 1904·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Fish, P. J.

1. The special lien given by the Civil Code, §2793, to laborers, on the product of their labor, attaches to the property of their employers only. See Quillian v. Central R. Co., 52 Ga. 374. Accordingly, when the owner of a locomotive sent it to a machine-shop to be repaired, an employee of the owner of the shop acquired no lien on the locomotive for his work done in repairing the same, though the result of such repairs was practically to make a new locomotive out of the old one.

2.Where, in such a case, an execution in favor of such an employee and against his employer, issued upon a proceeding to foreclose a special lien upon the locomotive, was levied thereon, an ordinary claim interposed by the owner of the locomotive was a proper remedy.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lanier v. Bailey, 48 S.E. 324, 120 Ga. 878, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 731 (Ga. 1904).

48 S.E. 324 (Lanier v. Bailey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gibbs v. Griffin
181 S.E.2d 285 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1971)
Gragg Lumber Co. v. Collins
139 S.E. 84 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1927)
Poss Bros. v. Haynie
139 S.E. 127 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1927)
Jonas v. Central Georgia Lumber Co.
132 S.E. 236 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1926)
Tallent v. Hunter
124 S.E. 361 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1924)
Hobbs v. Broad River Lumber Co.
123 S.E. 756 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1924)
Williams v. Herrington
76 S.E. 757 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1912)