Hobbs v. Broad River Lumber Co.
123 S.E. 756, 32 Ga. App. 447, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 450
This text of 123 S.E. 756 (Hobbs v. Broad River Lumber Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hobbs v. Broad River Lumber Co., 123 S.E. 756, 32 Ga. App. 447, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 450 (Ga. Ct. App. 1924).
Opinion
Under the facts of this case and the ruling in Lanier v. Bailey, 120 Ga. 878 (1) (48 S. E. 324), the court did not err in directing a verdict for the claimant. See, in this connection, Williams v. Herrington, 12 Ga. App. 77 (1) (76 S. E. 757); Baughman Automobile Co. v. Emanuel, 137 Ga. 354 (73 S. E. 511, 38 L. R. A. (N. S.) 97).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Poss Bros. v. Haynie
139 S.E. 127 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1927)
Hardin Lumber Co. v. Allen
134 S.E. 799 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1926)
Jonas v. Central Georgia Lumber Co.
132 S.E. 236 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1926)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
123 S.E. 756, 32 Ga. App. 447, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 450, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hobbs-v-broad-river-lumber-co-gactapp-1924.