Hobbs v. Broad River Lumber Co.
123 S.E. 756, 32 Ga. App. 447, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 450
Opinion
Under the facts of this case and the ruling in Lanier v. Bailey, 120 Ga. 878 (1) (48 S. E. 324), the court did not err in directing a verdict for the claimant. See, in this connection, Williams v. Herrington, 12 Ga. App. 77 (1) (76 S. E. 757); Baughman Automobile Co. v. Emanuel, 137 Ga. 354 (73 S. E. 511, 38 L. R. A. (N. S.) 97).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hobbs v. Broad River Lumber Co., 123 S.E. 756, 32 Ga. App. 447, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 450 (Ga. Ct. App. 1924).
123 S.E. 756 (Hobbs v. Broad River Lumber Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Poss Bros. v. Haynie
139 S.E. 127 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1927)
Hardin Lumber Co. v. Allen
134 S.E. 799 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1926)
Jonas v. Central Georgia Lumber Co.
132 S.E. 236 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1926)